Ruthenium (Ru) dyes are a well-known player in the field of dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs) due to their high efficiency and excellent stability. Their properties and complexes have been studied for almost three decades. Although these sensitizers show better performances, their high cost makes these third-generation solar devices less economical. Organic dyes have recently been explored as an alternative to Ru-based dyes due to their easy and low-cost synthesis. A comparative performance evaluation of Ru complexes and dicyanoisophorone and rhodanine organic dyes in ZnO-based DSSCs is here reported. All the Ru complexes showed better performance in comparison to organic dyes except R-4. Among the Ru sensitizers, R-3 exhibited the highest efficiency of 1.21% followed by R-2, which is attributed to the presence of several anchoring groups such as carboxyl, nitro and amine. However, the presence of more nitrogen-based groups has drastically reduced the performance as observed for R-4, which is the least performing dye among the Ru-based ones. On the contrary, organic sensitizers S-06 and P-4 revealed to be less efficient with respect to R-3 owing to the presence of only one anchoring group and weak photoanode/dye interaction.
Performance evaluation of ruthenium complexes and organic sensitizers in ZnO-based dye-sensitized solar cells / Ayub, Muniba; Shahzad, Nadia; Javed, Ahad Hussain; Mehmood, Sana; Nadeem, Saad; Khan, Zuhair S; Shakir, Sehar; Liaqat, Faroha; Shabir, Ghulam; Abbas, Faisal; Shahzad, Muhammad Imran; Pugliese, Diego. - In: ENGINEERING RESEARCH EXPRESS. - ISSN 2631-8695. - 6:2(2024). [10.1088/2631-8695/ad5787]
Performance evaluation of ruthenium complexes and organic sensitizers in ZnO-based dye-sensitized solar cells
Pugliese, DiegoWriting – Review & Editing
2024
Abstract
Ruthenium (Ru) dyes are a well-known player in the field of dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs) due to their high efficiency and excellent stability. Their properties and complexes have been studied for almost three decades. Although these sensitizers show better performances, their high cost makes these third-generation solar devices less economical. Organic dyes have recently been explored as an alternative to Ru-based dyes due to their easy and low-cost synthesis. A comparative performance evaluation of Ru complexes and dicyanoisophorone and rhodanine organic dyes in ZnO-based DSSCs is here reported. All the Ru complexes showed better performance in comparison to organic dyes except R-4. Among the Ru sensitizers, R-3 exhibited the highest efficiency of 1.21% followed by R-2, which is attributed to the presence of several anchoring groups such as carboxyl, nitro and amine. However, the presence of more nitrogen-based groups has drastically reduced the performance as observed for R-4, which is the least performing dye among the Ru-based ones. On the contrary, organic sensitizers S-06 and P-4 revealed to be less efficient with respect to R-3 owing to the presence of only one anchoring group and weak photoanode/dye interaction.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Editorial version.pdf
non disponibili
Tipologia:
final published article (publisher’s version)
Licenza:
Non Pubblico - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione
795.73 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
795.73 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
Post-print accepted manuscript.doc
embargo fino al 23/06/2025
Descrizione: Versione post-print accettata
Tipologia:
accepted manuscript (author’s post-print)
Licenza:
Pubblico - Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione
9.01 MB
Formato
Microsoft Word
|
9.01 MB | Microsoft Word | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.