In this article, we analyze by modeling two possible mechanisms for magnetization switching using spin-orbit torques, which have been reported to cause field-free deterministic switching in experiments. Here we compare the field-free magnetization switching due to a tilt of the anisotropy direction against the use of an antiferromagnetic bias field. Simple results obtained analytically show that a bias field not only causes the magnetization reversal but also reduces the corresponding energy barrier. The critical current required for magnetization switching is analyzed on the basis of a macrospin model. It is shown that although the field-free deterministic switching caused by a tilt of the anisotropy is more robust than the bias field in the development of memory elements, a compromise between requirements has to be adopted when selecting the parameters for specific applications.
A comparison of two different mechanisms for deterministic spin orbit torque magnetization switching / Garcia-Sanchez, F.; Soares, G.; Pasquale, M.. - In: JOURNAL OF MAGNETISM AND MAGNETIC MATERIALS. - ISSN 0304-8853. - 508:(2020), p. 166700. [10.1016/j.jmmm.2020.166700]
A comparison of two different mechanisms for deterministic spin orbit torque magnetization switching
Soares, G.Investigation
;Pasquale, M.Writing – Review & Editing
2020
Abstract
In this article, we analyze by modeling two possible mechanisms for magnetization switching using spin-orbit torques, which have been reported to cause field-free deterministic switching in experiments. Here we compare the field-free magnetization switching due to a tilt of the anisotropy direction against the use of an antiferromagnetic bias field. Simple results obtained analytically show that a bias field not only causes the magnetization reversal but also reduces the corresponding energy barrier. The critical current required for magnetization switching is analyzed on the basis of a macrospin model. It is shown that although the field-free deterministic switching caused by a tilt of the anisotropy is more robust than the bias field in the development of memory elements, a compromise between requirements has to be adopted when selecting the parameters for specific applications.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
comparison arXiv 2003.05468.pdf
accesso aperto
Descrizione: Authors pre-print available on arXiv
Tipologia:
submitted version (author’s pre-print)
Licenza:
Pubblico - Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione
2.86 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
2.86 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.