We report a pilot study organized within the Consultative Committee for Amount of Substance (CCQM), in which the ozone reference standards of 23 institutes have been compared to one common reference, the BIPM ozone reference standard, in a series of bilateral comparisons carried out between July 2003 and February 2005. The BIPM, which maintains as its reference standard a standard reference photometer (SRP) developed by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST, United States), served as pilot laboratory. A total of 25 instruments were compared to the common reference standard, either directly (16 comparisons) or via a transfer standard (9 comparisons). The comparisons were made over the ozone mole fraction range 0 nmol/mol to 500 nmol/mol. Two reference methods for measuring ozone mole fractions in synthetic air were compared, thanks to the participation of two institutes maintaining a gas-phase titration system with traceability of measurements to primary gas standards of NO and NO2, while the 23 other instruments were based on UV absorption. In the first instance, each comparison was characterized by the two parameters of a linear equation, as well as their related uncertainties, computed with generalized least-squares regression software. Analysis of these results using the Birge ratio indicated an underestimation of the uncertainties associated with the measurement results of some of the ozone standards, particularly the NIST SRPs. As a final result of the pilot study, the difference from the reference value (BIPM-SRP27 measurement result) and its related uncertainty were calculated for each ozone standard at the two nominal ozone mole fractions of 80 nmol/mol and 420 nmol/mol. Main text. To reach the main text of this paper, click on Final Report. The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the CCQM.
International Comparison CCQM-P28: Ozone at ambient level / Joële, Viallon1; Philippe, Moussay1; Michael, Esler; Robert, Wielgosz1; Wolfram, Bremser2; Jirí, Novák3; Miroslav, Vokoun3; Angelique, Botha4; Mellisa Janse Van, Rensburg4; Christoph, Zellweger5; Sandra, Goldthorp6; Annette, Borowiak7; Friedrich, Lagler7; Jari, Walden8; Ettore, Malgeri9; Sassi, MARIA PAOLA; Pilar Morillo, Gomez10; Rosalia Fernandez, Patier10; David Galan, Madruga10; Jin Chun, Woo11; Yong Doo, Kim11; Tatiana, Macé12; Christophe, Sutour12; Ana, Surget12; Bernhard, Niederhauser13; Daniel, Schwaller13; Beata, Frigy14; Irén Györgyné, Váraljai14; Shigeru, Hashimoto15; Hitoshi, Mukai15; Hiroshi, Tanimoto15; Hans Peter, Ahleson16; Axel, Egeløv16; Nils, Ladegard17; Leif, Marsteen17; Kjersti, Tørnkvist17; Franklin R., Guenther18; James E., Norris18; Theo L., Hafkenscheid19; Martin M., Van Rijn19; Paul, Quincey20; Bryan, Sweeney20; Sarka, Langer21; Bertil, Magnusson21; Juliana, Bastian22; Volker, Stummer22; Marina, Fröhlich23; Andreas, Wolf23; Leonid A., Konopelko24; Yuri A., Kustikov24; Dmitry V., Rumyanstev24. - In: METROLOGIA. - ISSN 0026-1394. - 43:Technical Supplement(2006). [10.1088/0026-1394/43/1A/08010]
International Comparison CCQM-P28: Ozone at ambient level
SASSI, MARIA PAOLA;
2006
Abstract
We report a pilot study organized within the Consultative Committee for Amount of Substance (CCQM), in which the ozone reference standards of 23 institutes have been compared to one common reference, the BIPM ozone reference standard, in a series of bilateral comparisons carried out between July 2003 and February 2005. The BIPM, which maintains as its reference standard a standard reference photometer (SRP) developed by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST, United States), served as pilot laboratory. A total of 25 instruments were compared to the common reference standard, either directly (16 comparisons) or via a transfer standard (9 comparisons). The comparisons were made over the ozone mole fraction range 0 nmol/mol to 500 nmol/mol. Two reference methods for measuring ozone mole fractions in synthetic air were compared, thanks to the participation of two institutes maintaining a gas-phase titration system with traceability of measurements to primary gas standards of NO and NO2, while the 23 other instruments were based on UV absorption. In the first instance, each comparison was characterized by the two parameters of a linear equation, as well as their related uncertainties, computed with generalized least-squares regression software. Analysis of these results using the Birge ratio indicated an underestimation of the uncertainties associated with the measurement results of some of the ozone standards, particularly the NIST SRPs. As a final result of the pilot study, the difference from the reference value (BIPM-SRP27 measurement result) and its related uncertainty were calculated for each ozone standard at the two nominal ozone mole fractions of 80 nmol/mol and 420 nmol/mol. Main text. To reach the main text of this paper, click on Final Report. The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the CCQM.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.